28.12.09

another year, another beer

2009 is about over. Time for another year to screw with my mind and rock my world.

No matter the age or level of wisdom, each moment had is a learning experience. The past year has come with its own lessons, some of them new, some old and some have simply been confirmations of tested and untested theories or addendums to past beliefs.

Over the past year I've learned...

  • Accepting change comes with letting go of formerly held beliefs
  • Love is not enough
  • Indulgences make life easier
  • Even teachers and people with advanced degrees cannot figure out the bloody difference between their/there, it's/its, your/you're, etc.
  • Sometimes it's accidental
  • Addictions are a crutch
  • There's a reason we need a crutch
  • Weakness is not shameful
  • Sometimes I'm not ashamed, even when I really, really should be
  • You don't have to be a sociopath to not feel guilty when you've done something wrong
  • Or maybe I am a sociopath
  • When you are one person all your life, it takes more than a handsome face and loving arms to change you into a different person no matter how badly you both want that change
  • Even if you love 99% of one thing, that missing 1% can be just enough to change your mind
  • On the other hand, sometimes that 1% is trivial
  • Comfort and familiarity aside, there's a reason we fit, a reason we work together even when we don't want to
  • I am finally 100% sure that I am totally done for
  • Convenience is often a major factor
  • Some attachments are actually good
  • Independence is the hardest thing to let go of, nothing else even comes close
  • I am incapable of turning the other cheek
  • Sometimes revenge has a taste other than "sweet"
  • It's not 7, it's 6
  • None of them mattered
  • I love living on Guam
  • I hate living on Guam
  • If you ask a person with no fingernails to scratch an itch, it won't feel good and you will be left unsatisfied
  • I was right from the start, you really are the one
  • Everything is better with you
  • Sanity = my homeys
  • I am not above anything
  • You are the only one who is worth it
  • You are worth anything
  • You are still my home
  • I really am ready

Happy New Year, everyone. Make it count. Do what you do. Live your life. Don't take it too seriously. Let what happens happen and figure out where you fit in all of it. Sometimes taking a step back and observing the way the tides move is the most important part of learning and living. Make mistakes, laugh at yourself, remember where you've been, let it go. Move on. And don't be afraid.

"Je ne les crains pas. C'est pour cela que je suis nee." -Jeanne d'Arc

Look it up.

19.12.09

trimming it down some

In fitting with the streamline theme I plan on working on for the forseeable future, I'm playing a requiem for my parenting blog and moving the stuff on over this way.

The first throwback: Flipping out. It's just something I do from time to time.

life is seldom all rainbows and sunshine. even the happiest people find themselves feeling the cracks in their foundation get larger and larger and suddenly have barely a second to decide whether they want to indulge in an nervous breakdown or not. many people don't want to admit that they have such emotions, let alone show them to others. often, the last people we want to be witness to such a moment of weakness are children, especially our own.

among many of the reasons why we choose not to show our kids such things is believing that we should represent strength and stability to children who are still learning about the world around them and the way they should respond to that world. if mommy and daddy can't handle the stress, why would they think they should be able to?

so when i find myself in the middle of a breakdown i no longer have the strength to fight off and i am unable to get myself into a room that has minimal childish traffic and there's a little boy asking out loud, "why is my mommy crying?" my first instinct is to wipe away my tears and pretend everything is okay. then i realize that no amount of hiding myself now is going to change the fact that i was already caught. kane starts offering me candy, telling me not to cry and then looks knowingly at his daddy and says, "mommy just needs to lie down." (son, mommy needs to lie down for several years...)i start to wonder about the effects this will have on my son. and then i realize that just as with all things, such a spectacle should be accompanied by one very important thing: communication.

when the shoe is on the other foot and kane or drew find themselves too upset to function, i neither ignore nor coddle. i try to remember that this is not some animal to train but a human being with real emotions, valid whether we like to think they are or not. i do my best to redirect their frustration and try to calm them down, using words to express those feelings when applicable. these aren't things only children can benefit from. these are things we all need. and what could be more comforting to such a young child than knowing that mommy and daddy get upset sometimes too.

before the wave of emotion even passes i make sure that when my son is trying to understand how i feel and why i'm crying, i acknowledge his questions and accept his help. if he feels he can comfort me, it stands to reason that it will make him more inclined to let me comfort him. when i am able to be calm and speak reasonably, i confirm what he's already beginning to understand: adults cry when they are sad, too. i let him know it's okay. i let him know that being sad is momentary and i will now always be this way. i let him know that we can make decisions and look at the world more positively and start to feel better. and i let him know that everyone needs help and comfort sometimes.

there's no shame in showing weakness to your children. there's nothing wrong with letting them know that you are just like them. it's a raw form of communication that shows them what you may not be able to "just tell". and communication when expressed appropriately is never a bad thing.

15.12.09

let them play again...

...in some other way, and let them be happy."

that was quoted from the afterword of a scanner darkly, one of my favorite novels by my favorite science fiction writer, philip k. dick. a scanner darkly is a semi-autobiographical novel about drug use and drug culture. the novel, itself, is not the central point to this specific blog. the afterword, however, is one of several inspirations for me to post this entry.

the above quote referred to a list of some of the author's loved ones, "some people who were punished entirely too much for what they did." (copyright philip k. dick, 1977) these people were addicts, as dick once was as well. "what they did" was drugs. their punishment was the natural effects of the drugs they did. fitting in with the overall theme of the novel, it's an indictment of a society that creates problems, gives us the tools to get through those problems and the reality that some of those tools caused more pain in the end than the very pain those drugs were used to alleviate.

i'm also writing this while watching sober house, a reality program about celebrities living in a house meant to be a transition place between rehab and the real world as they have not experienced it in a long time: as a sober person. i watch these people, some of whom i consider amazingly talented, all of whom have lost close to everything because of their drug use. sadly, part of what they lost is what made them famous. they lost their drive, their ambition, often their talent. very often, they lost the people who aided in their fame: their closest loved ones and fellow collaborators.

people often excuse this drug use and behavior. a person creates a masterpiece be it a song, film, work of literature or visual art and their fans are sometimes quick to believe that drugs were an integral part of that work. often, it can be. my own experiences with drugs have either relaxed me to approach what i was doing with ease and less stress; or energized me so that i could keep up with the demands of an overladen schedule; and sometimes it felt as though it opened my mind to consider and appreciate ideas i wouldn't normally have when sober. the last of those mentioned effects have been spoken about ad nauseum.

talent is talent. inspiration comes from the mind and from experiences. and it can be argued that without those experiences, some of our favorite works -- a scanner darkly, for example -- would never have been created and we would never have the benefit of enjoying such works. consider, then, what the artists' intentions were when in the midst of conceptualization. consider, then, what a huge insult it is to the artists when people believe such talent comes mainly or even partially from drug use. several tests have been done to study and record the effects of various drugs on artists. an overwhelming majority of them reported some sort of improvement in their craft in technique, approach and content. but what degree of improvement was there? what would patrons and consumers think of the difference between sober pieces and those that were created under the influence?

on top of everything else, people see correlation between talent and drug use without attempting to understand the effects those drugs have had on their lives as a whole. i have yet to encounter any artist in any field who functioned better, as a whole, in the duration of their lives and all aspects of it, when under the influence.

i have met people, mostly amateur artists, who claim they have drug use to thank for any part of their lives whether they had talent or not. all of those people were still under the notion that what they did was good, inspired and worth notice. none of them realized how wrong they were. personally, not only does that show me a person who is living under a delusion that they have achieved one thing or another when they haven't, but it shows me a person who was not strong or sane enough to handle drugs in the first place. they were never better for the use. they were, in fact, worse than before and before, they weren't that good to begin with.

it further makes me consider my past drug use and the drug use of people i love or once loved dearly. it brings me to a deeper and darker part of my mind and causes me to recollect on all of our experiences, together and individually. i don't often share my personal experiences with people who know me and i don't intend to here either. if you know me and want to know, you can just ask. i also won't share the intimate details of loved ones whose lives have been ravaged by drug use.

details are not needed to illustrate what i believe most people already know but are too scared to acknowledge. they are fearful of seeming straight, conservative, rigid or boring. they are fearful of admitting that with their experimentation and curiosity they are leaving out some of the most painful and scary parts of use. they are fearful of what their friends may think while all these friends are just as blind, just as deluded.

people make mistakes. people turn to drugs for so many reasons. life is not normally pleasant. sometimes it's damn exhausting and soul crushing. sometimes we hurt so much that we turn to different things to make the pain go away. we don't want to feel unhappy in the real world so we decide to turn to other things to make us happy in our own minds. no person who's lived that life for long has ever been happy, truly. no person who lives in their fantasy can appreciate reality. no person who has escaped that fantasy has been able to instantly leave that made up world and face the real one with integrity and dignity. the slow and arduous path to sobriety is often the most difficult journey a person can make.

some people just want to know. they want to figure out the hype. they are curious. they see their friends indulge and they hear stories of their experiences. very often, especially with infrequent or initial use, those experiences are interesting and enjoyable. so they want to have that experience, too. they want to experiment. and they never consider what will happen when that experience is over and they realize how much of their life they squandered away, either the days spent outside of reality or the days they have lost out on when their health starts to deteriorate.

all things considered, i sound a bit hypocritical. and truthfully, i am. but there's still one more side to it. when it comes to drug culture i first and foremost believe that one cannot consider himself to be a part of that culture until he's seen or experienced close to all of the effects of drug use and addiction, the good, the bad and the very, very ugly.

as we lose people we love day to day and attend more funerals and comfort more people for those losses, we think about the events that led to that loss. in most cases we are witness to lives and deaths that were not the fault of those who passed. death from drug use, however, belongs in the hands of the user alone. as dick said, "they wanted to have a good time, but they were like children playing in the street; they could see one after another--run over, maimed, destroyed--but they continued to play anyhow."

remember all those people: loved ones, friends, strangers and idols who enjoyed a brief moment of joy and lost everything they had because they couldn't stop playing. remember their legacy and that part of it is allowing you a glimpse into a troubled mind and life that was too sensitive for this fucked up world. consider that most of them would not want you to idolize and replicate their mistakes that were interpreted to be part of their greatest accomplishments. consider that those works that move and touch you also should also teach and motivate you. consider that the best way to remember and honor them is to learn from them and live the life they didn't. appreciate the world around you through clear and open eyes. appreciate what you were given and make the best of it.

but also remember that although this is an affliction that we have brought onto ourselves, that this world, by nature, supplies the very things that hurt us most and disguises them as the one thing that can make everything better. remember that the punishment all of us receive was not only brought on by choice and action but also by cruelty and irony. remember that underneath everything is a person who feels and hurts. remember that underneath is a person who deserves love and a person who can love.

in closing, i'd like to take my cue from dick. i'd like to remember the people who were very big parts of my life, those i may not have known but whose lives touched those of the people i love most, who also paid too dearly for what they did:


to c.f., deceased
to m.g., permanent liver damage
to a.d., deceased
to d.d., deceased
to d.f., deceased
to r.t., missing, permanent brain damage
to j.q., permanent brain damage
to c.s., incarcerated, permanent liver damage
to a.b., permanent psychosis
to m.s., permanent psychosis
to everyone else who've lost any function of life or life, itself, to drug use
to those who've lost their loved ones to drug use
to those struggling to save those they love
to those struggling to save themselves
to those who struggle still, even while sober
to those who relapse and face the demons they fought so long to keep at bay
to those who don't realize, yet, how much they've lost

12.12.09

preemptive strike on broken new year resolutions

The new year is upon us and with it comes the desire to make resolutions. And with that come the promises one often breaks more often than any other promise made. We try our hardest to take other's secrets to the grave, fulfill the requests of loved ones who need our help and support and remember how strong the word "promise" should be. But we break the promises we make to ourselves. We either sacrifice or indulge when it comes to our own desires when really, those are the few promises we should stay faithful to.

Last year my resolution was simple: Lowered expectations. What kind of expectations?

I expect mutuality and reciprocation. I will try to compromise and give you the things you want if there's effort on your part to do the same for me. More, I expect only a certain degree of that reciprocation. It would be nice if you could try to understand the two things I ask of you when you give me a long list of things you need from me. I don't expect you to bake me a last-minute birthday cake, completely free of charge, as I did for you. But a simple, "Happy Birthday" would have been nice. I expect that my step-son be treated equally as my biological children. Alternately, I also expect people to treat my children the same way they would treat their older brother. I expect people to respect that my husband and I are our children's only parents and therefor, we make the rules. I expect that when I try to explain something to you that you listen to every word I say. I expect you to only consider the words I am saying without making assumptions. I expect even more when those words are not said, but written. I expect you to carefully read every word in an email, letter or other kind of message and I expect an attempt to understand those words. I expect people of a given vocation to respect the works of others of that vocation. I don't expect you to laugh at and insult the efforts of those who have probably worked harder and achieved more than you could hope to in all your life time. I expect mutuality and reciprocation even when it does not involve me. I expect to engage in debates with people who know what they are talking about. I don't expect loosely-based observations and anecdotes as proof. I expect people to understand the difference between the ideas of lay-people and the ideas of experts. I expect people to get the facts before they spread propaganda. I expect people to protest against things only when they understand them. I don't expect antagonism before you even know what you are actually speaking out against. I expect logic. I expect people of a certain age to understand widely known phenomena. But I still expect a certain degree of rechecking the facts before talking about that phenomena. I expect that if you are going to ridicule the actions of others, you choose not to take part in a similar action. I expect people to have as much of a distaste for hypocrisy as I do.

Actually, those are the things I expected once upon a time and my resolution has been to let go of all of that. Being pleasantly surprised when someone surpasses lowered expectations is much better than the disappointment felt when people do not meet expectations. I also realize that sometimes we don't know what we're doing when we're doing it. I'm clearly not above that. I know that some of my disappointment was at situations run by people who did not know what the consequences of their actions were. I also know that everyone else has their own expectations and their own lives, each with an entirely separate sequence of events and moments that have shaped who they are in a way completely different from my own life's experiences. Why should others live up to my expectations? They have their own lives to worry about. Thus, lowered expectations allows all of us to simply live the lives we need to in order to get through this mess.

This coming year I have a new one. It's actually phase 2 of the previous year's with a similar goal. Streamline. Efficiency. Simplify. And mostly, appreciate.

This is regarding any social sphere I am, have been or could potentially be a part of. In 2010 I plan to cut my losses, move on from acquaintances that are more trouble than they are worth, understand that no one is better or worse than the next but simply different and that differences are sometimes just a sign that despite our best efforts - or shoddy efforts, if that be the case - sometimes we just cannot get along.

This was partially inspired by a piece of technology nestled in my mom's room aka the computer room: The computer and all the things it's connected me to.

My computer has afforded me some wonderful connections. I have old classmates online, some of whom I haven't spoken to in years. Some of whom I didn't particularly care for all those years ago. The beauty of it all is that despite the fact that it once again shows my age, we've all grown and matured and lived long enough to get the hell over it. These virtual strangers have become my friends. And we would say hi to each other face to face now, all because we've made a reconnection in a more comfortable place and stuck to it.

There are very close loved ones I haven't seen in a long time and if life permitted, we'd still desperately love to live closer to one another so that sharing our lives wasn't done so over oceans and expanses of land.

There are people who live right around the corner. But life is busy. Our calender's are full. We have things pulling us in many different directions and getting together is rather difficult. So we pop in every now and then with a few taps on the keyboard or mobile, simultaneously juggling work, parenthood, marriage, etc.

In that group are friends I've never even known in real life. We found each other via the web, connected by similar lives and interests. Very few make an impact but I'm lucky to have known them.

We've developed or maintained a glimpse of our recent lives, shared in eachother's blessings and accomplishments and offered support with a few lines when life was more difficult and less joyous. We've had good conversations over a few beers, laughed at each others' jokes, stories and antics. We've mingled in groups, making our way from one person to another, making sure we've covered all of our bases.

And that's all been worth it. But that doesn't cover the acquaintances that haven't been.

Mutual interests aren't enough of a link when we are otherwise so different that whatever link we have is overshadowed by personalities that just don't mix. There are virtual connections to strangers over the Internet that sadly do nothing but reinforce every stereotype and preconceived notion we've had about "those kinds of people". There is the family we choose and the family we are born to and most of the time, the family we are born to has a natural love for us and has been given enough time to further develop that love. But sometimes we realize that blood is not strong enough to give fuel to that love. I've had co-workers who are so awesome that all others pale in comparison. We learn that that kind of connection is natural and cannot be forced. We learn that sometimes the place where we work is just that and nothing more. There are faces of the past who still live there, who have not matured enough to forget what had happened or realize that not only do those things not matter, but they never did. And of course there are those who don't meet those expectations I mentioned.

Sometimes we just move on, knowing that the connections we have are enough, knowing that we will make even more connections as we grow and live. It's a milder form of cutting ties and burning bridges. It's knowing that some things are worth the effort and others are not and in a world of over six-billion people, there are certain things that are and always will be true. No one is alone, not even those who desire nothing but solitude, as we have the influences of the many who came before us in a world shaped by people presently here. We have friends and family and all kinds of acquaintances who fill our world with experiences that would not have been possible without them. They are worth the attempt to make new connections. But when new connections don't work out, then that's okay. Look forward to the next meeting and the next person ready to contribute to your world as you contribute to theirs. But don't stress the fact that some people won't make the cut. Don't stress that sometimes you won't make theirs.

And on top of anything else, appreciate what you do have because no matter what it is, you have been blessed.

27.11.09

battling demons in face paint and big shoes

As children, the world is an infinite source of wonder, enhanced only as much as our imagination will allow (and children are pros at imagination, God willing). It's never a good thing when any small part of the imagination takes a negative turn and something meant to bring joy is turned into the things nightmares are made of. Life begins to suck just a little bit the moment the idea of something fun is turned into a reality that is anything but pleasant. For me, that moment happened when I was six or so and something terrible happened. I haven't been the same since. Every other part of this event is blurry to the point that I've been unable to really recall most details. All I know is that there were children and balloons, pizza and fried chicken and mojo potatoes, presents and laughter. (Yes, we were at Shakey's. Every birthday party was at Shakey's.) The entertainment arrived and he began his show. He was wobbly and I'm sure we all thought that was part of his act. That is until he wobbled one last time and collapsed. I remember gasps and screams and crying. I'm not sure I reacted aside from being scared stiff. I also remember thinking that this was the first time I had seen someone die in front of me. Turns out the clown was drunk and he passed out. And I don't mean that figuratively. It was a clown. And for all intents and purposes, a dead clown.


Thus a fear was born. It has a name but is not even recognized in psychological circles. The experts who decided that can kiss my ass. Coulrophobia is real. enough. It's real and it sucks. I've never seen It or Killer Clowns from Outer Space. I would normally love Commedia dell'arte but can't really enjoy it because of Arlecchino. Circuses freak me out. I once threatened to punch a clown who approached me while my friend tried to tell him how serious I was and talk me down at the same time. I have a visible, audible reaction to even a still picture of a clown. You have to admit that they do look fricking scary. There's a reason there are horror movies about them. So don't even go there.

And then it gets really weird.

Examining different parts of my personality, as I am wont to do, I've discovered that when it concerns moving picture and literature, aside from genre or movement, there are two recurring themes in what I like. Most often they occur separately but when they do appear in the same work together, I am usually through the roof in ecstatic fandom. Those two themes are traveling carnivals/circuses and America the 1930's. The one work that blew my mind with its awesomeness was Carnivale, an HBO series that ran for two seasons between 2003 and 2005 before being cancelled do to high costs of production even though the program was a big success from its debut. If you haven't seen it, check it out. It's breathtaking. It's flawless. It's so good that I am mentioning it in this blog entry despite the fact that it is not at all relevant.

Of course the relevant part of that tidbit is the whole carnival/circus deal. Obviously, it's because they usually have some kind of clown-like weirdo terrorizing patrons. It's a morbid fascination. A clown in any other venue is cause for a violent reaction. And even in a carnival setting, I cover my eyes and cringe (or scream) when I see a clown. But I admit that I also peak through the cracks between my fingers as tears well in my eyes. (Yes, sometimes I am close to crying. Or, again, screaming.)


And that hasn't been the only thing that seems paradoxical. More years ago than I'd like to admit, I had to think about my senior quote to appear beside my picture in the yearbook. Being someone who loves words, this was actually a very difficult decision. Nothing stood out more than others. There were many quotes I liked equally and I could have gone in any direction. As someone involved in the arts, should I use an artsy quote? Or a literary quote? Something about being a woman? Something humorous or something serious? Maybe a quote from anyone of my favorite songs or a nod to my favorite genres. I didn't do any of those things. Instead I went against my usual character and used a commercial ad from a clothing company. As a teenager who really didn't care much for fashion, it was unexpected. It was also simple. Maybe a bit trite. But it really did make sense. In seven words it said a lot about my state of mind, or at least the state of mind I convinced myself was real. Maybe not real but close enough.


It was even for a brand I didn't know anything about. I didn't own any of the label's products. I couldn't even tell you if I've ever actually seen this brand in real life. Perhaps you remember this:




That's my senior quote right there. That's a brand I am unfamiliar with. And yes, that's a clown. In a straight jacket. The message meant to be conveyed is that this clown is insane. Insanity is scary. Clowns are scary. You draw those parallels. It's not that hard to see the horror in this ad.

I cannot tell you why this happens. I cannot begin to understand why what is arguably my biggest fear keeps popping up in things I like or why they only occur in certain forms. And if I were honest with myself, the reality is that I don't like these things in spite of. I like these things because of.

It's sick and twisted but very, very common. It's the horrible accident you slow down to watch. It's scary movies and messed-up images and the knowledge that something that freaks you out so much also gets you excited. It's the adrenaline of fear. It's a naturally occurring irony that I accept even though I am not too proud to say that this fascination has not really helped me battle those demons. It has intensified my fears rather than dispel them. But I keep telling myself that it's helping me conquer those fears, anyway, even if it's a big old lie. Besides, as a parent more in touch with a sense of mortality and responsibility, I've begrudgingly retired from more dangerous adrenaline addictions and stupid antics. Perhaps my fascination with this fear and the means with which I am able to reason my way through it is all the rush I can allow, now.

And maybe one day I actually will get over my fears. Because it was pretty difficult trying to find a picture of that ad, copy, upload and position it in this entry with my eyes closed.

20.11.09

Twilight Madness: The New Frontier in Vampire Fan Hysteria

Cool it, Meyer fans. I'm actually speaking up for the craze this time.

I have this issue with snobbery. I like to consider myself a recovering elitist. This applies to those situations outside of human relations. I was once a music snob. I was a movie snob. That's toned down, some. But the literary snob in me is still floating there on the surface. It's a bit expected, though. Being an English Lit major, it's a an occupational hazard. And thus I was thrust into a program that often had me forgetting one half of arts and entertainment: the ENTERTAINMENT!

Whether happily or begrudgingly fed literary classics and expected to discuss and research and analyze ad nauseum, I've been trained to look for that which is hidden, things not expressed by the definitions of the parts (the words) but those hidden beneath the text in the author's subconscious. I look for things everywhere, even when it's not there. But not every dog-eared paperback tossed on to the floor from my bed has to be an in-depth study. It doesn't have to be an artistic work designed to push boundaries and ask questions and force the reader to question one's own set of morals and the life he has led. Sometimes it just has to give us a magnificent mental picture, one so vivid and so lively that there is almost no question as to what the writer wants you to see. And sometimes it just has to fit into a pattern that has been proven repeatedly to provoke a captive audience and draw us fiercely into the story that we become emotionally involved with the lives of characters who now exist in the minds of millions of strangers. There is significant artistic merit in both of those abilities.

The latter is what Meyer's books are. This is what the Twilight series was meant to do. One thing cannot be argued, no matter how unskilled of a writer she is or how trite -- or sometimes, bogus -- her ideas may be. If Meyer is anything she is a woman with a decent understanding of what young women generally want in a fantasy. Beyond that, she knew how to present this idea in a package so pretty and inviting that her influence has reaches none of us were expecting. True, this is a collection of novels that were quite obviously written in very little time, with not much thought and almost no research. More, it did scream "debut novel by an inexperienced and unlearned writer". It is brainless, effortless reading and that cannot be argued. But only the pretentious and the image-conscious are afflicted with the problem of demanding constant, elevated, cerebral stimulation. And pretentious and image-conscious are not anywhere on my list of attractive traits. Rather, I tend to believe that it's the person most secure with himself that is able to let go and accept stimuli with an open mind. Even intelligent people enjoy brainless entertainment. Sometimes it's exactly what the intellectual needs.

I have many criticisms of the books and subsequent movies, some of which are directly related to its commercially formed content and fancy packaging. The first being in that such a pretty package, it's lost all sense of reality. While it could be argued that the point of fantasy is to be an escape from reality, the fact is that in every work of fiction -- fantasy or reality-based-- the author's aim is to show a sense of humanity. That's the one part that connects the reader to the plot. All of our favorite fantasy characters, good or evil, represent some connection. Meyer's characters didn't do that for me. Their alleged love for each other was overridden by a sense of biological need devoid of actual chemistry or an attraction that makes any sort of sense. It had me questioning how deep this love would be had Edward not been a vampire and had Bella's blood not been so enticing. There was little explanation in the way of why her blood was so smelly or the fact that Edward could not read her mind, emphasizing that sense of an uncontrollable lust. Perhaps this carnal attraction was a metaphor for the emotional desire that becomes a physical need in our idea of real-life love. But her emphasis seemed misdirected and not very artistically expressed. Thus that has become my only real criticism for the works as a whole. My bottom line is that Meyer is not a skilled writer. She is, however, skilled at understanding the young female mind and that is the crux of these works.

Another criticism is the Edward and Jacob love among the female population. Going back to the target audience, I understand immediately why teenage girls developed wild crushes on these characters. Then these crushes took over an older female population and that had me a bit confused. Except, really, it's not that strange. All I need to do is catch some movies from the 90's starring Christian Slater or Stephen Dorff and I am instantly that teenage girl, semi-giddy of the men who were to be the loves of my life. It's more than a flashback. Those crushes were arguably more intense than any recent attraction to Jason Statham and Gerard Butler. And that girl is still in me somewhere. There is a part of me still attracted to Jordan Catalano (I have my own issues with strange attraction, shut up.) Besides, there is the simple fact that men seem to be above reproach when it concerns younger-than-average objects of attraction. Why shouldn't an older woman understand that draw of a young, mysterious man if for no other reason than Edward and Jacob seem to try a whole lot harder than the average grown man? Let's face it, while men love to laugh at our silly childish fantasies, the reality is that the average man could stand to learn a thing or two from Edward Cullen. As if male fantasies aren't just as silly and eye-roll worthy.

Among all of that, there seems to be one source of disfavor among the anti-Twilightians and that has to do with the theory of vampire folklore canon. This is actually the one part of the harsh criticism of Meyers' novels that I disagree with vehemently. The vampire purists are claiming that Meyers raped the image of vampires with Edward's sparkly skin and ability to love a human beyond blood-lust. They call into question how a vampire would be able to deny his own nature as what should be a predatory creature. They are disturbed with the way Meyer has changed the genre. And I say that these self-proclaimed vampire purists know very, very little about the mythos.

Vampires, as we know them, have not been around for very long. This alleged canon is barely a couple centuries old. Garlic, mirrors, graves, the ability to shapeshift into an animal, the aversion to sun, superhuman strength, all of it is a recent occurrence in a world with tales and legends that are often thousands of years old. While it is true that vampire-like creatures have existed for ages, they were hardly anything like any of the vampire characters we've seen in movies or read in books. With 19th century writers such as John Polidori and Bram Stoker, a new creature was born, one that most people associate with the notion of vampire.

So the question remains: If Stoker and Polidori and their contemporaries could change the idea of vampires, from the those that existed for centuries before, and create this brand new character that we now recognize, why can't Meyer do the same? Where do we draw the line as far as how mythos is changed? Why are there limits?

And really, are sparkly vampires that much sillier than an aristocratic Dracula? I think not.

There is, however, one thing I'd like the fans to consider when dealing with those of us who are not fans. Just keep in mind, while more mature fans probably resent being lumped into the same category as little girls with curfews and Algebra homework, we don't always like being associated with the rest of the people who dislike Twilight. Not everyone is cut from the same cloth of forced non-conformity in an attempt to be interesting. While it's pretty lame to jump on a bandwagon of trend and popularity, it's equally as lame to join the ranks of critics just because something is popular. I know that. I'm fully capable of having reasons to dislike any work of art based on my own experiences and thoughts.

So while I'll never be one willing to spend a single cent on the series or anything that comes from it, and I have no problems admitting that had I a daughter, I'd probably shield her from the Twilight mania if only to save myself from the residual exposure, and though I know that I went into reading the books and watching the movie with a full helping of skepticism, I am not above understanding the hype. I don't agree, per se. But I get it. I'd just rather return to sender after having got it.

And here I wait for a modern vampire story and movie I can actually get behind that didn't come from a comic book (Blade was truly awesome). I really appreciate the legend behind vampires and the legends that were its predecesor. I just wish that someone would put it all together in something I appreciate so I can move beyond German expressionism and find that connection I mentioned before. Because there ain't a damn person in any of my social circles that wouldn't look at me strangely as I weep and sob over an almost century-old silent film.

F.W. Murnau has some explaining to do.

Now that's what I call a vampire.

18.10.09

jon and kate plus eight...million

A couple years ago, the world fell in love with the Gosselins. Here was a pretty attractive couple with eight gorgeous kids living a life many of us both dread and sometimes even hope for. Many people tuned in and watched in wonder as Jon and Kate dealt with having to take care of six babies while still trying to raise their older and still rambunctious twin girls. People, those with kids and those without, cringed at the mess and stress of having so many children under one roof. Some of us got past the craziness of their house and simply saw a family that had more people to love and be loved by. And I know I wasn't the only parent out there shaking my head at the irony of having that many kids in one shot and how it often leads to endorsements and the chance to provide for that many kids, financially, while I can barely afford the two I have. No one offered me instant money. I have to provide for my family the old-fashioned way.

As we intruded on their lives, even with their permission, we got to know them more and more. And as with those on the outskirts of celebrity -- 21st century reality stars, not quite "one of us", not quite "one of them" -- while they lived publicly, they struggled publicly. All the inner workings of an everyday relationship became public access and the viewing public are given carte blanche to view, analyze and opine over what is just a slightly out of the ordinary home.

With the recent knowledge of their separation and the alleged reasons for it, a mostly adoring public became quite a savage one, picking apart every part of the Gosselin's worlds. Of course it's only natural to believe that if someone is gonna put it out there, they should expect a reaction. Their lives have been, for the most part, an open book. The Gosselins should have expected people to have strong opinions about the things they've done. However, they probably didn't expect their lives to take any of the turns they have and thus, were not prepared for the inevitable reaction.

Which begs the question: Should they have done something differently so as to avoid criticism? It's a Catch 22. If they put on a front for the public, suppressing some of the most natural emotions and instincts, wouldn't people dislike them, believing their lives to be only an act? Having remained true to a certain extent, they still were under fire by the over-zealous and highly opinionated public they invited into their homes because they believed theirs was a story worth sharing.

I'm very aware of the fact that their decision to make their lives so public was at least partially motivated by dollar signs and a more affluent lifestyle. Can we truly blame them? Consider all of us without kids or with just a few. Any extra money we bring in may be used for savings or we can choose to use that money for extravagances, large or small. But the Gosselins couldn't afford that initial luxury anyway, not with the amount of children or the occupations they had. They didn't just have eight kids spaced out throughout the years. That's the cost of taking care of a baby multiplied by eight, all in one shot. This is in addition to how much it costs to make room for that many children. Even if the Gosselins intended to use the promise of money for luxury, how can anyone be so naive or judgmental as to not understand the lure of financial stability not just for their family, now, but for their family as they grow?

Beyond that, the Gosselins were criticized for many other things. The first started with the very conception of both their children and the program. They and others who use fertility treatments when they cannot have children in what is considered the "natural" way, offend many people who believe that their decision goes against nature and/or God. Many people believe that with so many unwanted children in this world, it's selfish to go to such extents to have a biological child when they could have spent that money trying to adopt a child who desperately needs a home. I wonder how such people forget how profound it is to have a child that has genetic connection to his or her parent. I wonder how they can ignore the many couples in this world who want to share their love by creating a human being that is the personification of that couple's love to one another. I wonder why they don't consider the pain of women who have had what they considered their God-given right taken away. Children who are adopted through any means are most often just as much a part of their families as natural children would be. However, expecting any person to gladly give up their right to have their own biological children is ludicrous and unfeeling. The cruel irony of those opposed to fertility treatment is that while they believe such parents are being apathetic about the many children who exist who need good homes, the same opposition is being heartless toward the parents who desperately want biological children of their own, ones they've felt a bond with from conception.

We've also viewed a woman become slightly unhinged at times. Kate got herself a bad reputation as being an over-bearing, obsessive control freak who mistreated her softer-spoken husband and viciously restricted her many children. The woman has eight kids who are all very close in age. We were not watching some seasoned mother raise the tenth child of a long line of offspring that range in ages from adulthood to infancy. Eight small children under one roof with only one set of parents. That is a serious situation that would test the most calm, cool-headed person. Of course she's controlling! She has to be! I lose my mind rather often with just my two. I've resorted to begging. I've kicked toys around the house while others could have sworn they saw my clothes threatening to rip over skin that was expanding and quickly turning green. Let's not even get into my losing my cool when dealing with my husband.

And when their lives started to fall apart, when two people who once loved each other deeply started buckling under the pressure of that many children, that much stress, that much scrutiny and that little privacy, it became even more fodder for those who love nothing more than to ignore their own lives to find fault in everyone else's. As if they were the first couple in the history of the world to find themselves falling out of love with a person who was changing too quickly to keep up with, or to be too consumed with stress to show love and affection, or to concentrate too much on their kids that they lose sight of the person who they made those kids with, or to find themselves moving on and finding solace and comfort in someone who wasn't too busy, selfish or short-sighted to show love, we thought we knew so much more about the Gosselins than they knew about themselves. We knew more about how to make marriages work just as we knew more about how to properly raise that many children.

And then, by far, the worst example of this type of scrutiny are those comments made by the media-mongers, the people who are in the very business that promotes such an open-door policy to the Gosselins' lives. With the recent news of Jon allegedly stealing money from their account, he came out with proof that he was innocent. And as he sat at a table with four of those media-mongers, Bethenny Frankel, another pseudo-celeb who lived her life in the public eye, had the audacity to criticize him for doing so in public. Why no one pointed out that woman's sheer stupidity is beyond me. How she could sit there, invited to give her opinion on what would normally be a private situation, and criticize the person who gave her the opportunity to be there, making money off of someone else's pain, is one of the most obvious examples of what morons people can be. Though, to be fair, it's not like Frankel was ever accused of having a triple digit IQ.

Let's not even get into Nancy Grace and her BS. I don't care what kind of experience she has or where she's gotten the idea that she has a brain worth sharing. Right, viewers gave her that idea. Viewers also made Perez Hilton a celebrity and had Jerry Springer as the reigning king of TV for a while. The woman didn't even know what a bankers box was.

I understand that a big part of the concern is about the kids. They will probably never have normal lives. They clearly won't be living the ideal. But why stop there? Why stop at criticizing Jon and Kate for the lives they've delivered their children as though they are being selfish? What about the many other parents who aren't giving their children ideal lives? Parents who have busy occupations. Parents who have dangerous occupations. Mothers who choose to work instead of stay home with their kids. Aren't they equally selfish? Are soldiers wrong for being parents? Look at famed politicians' children. Should the President be denied the right of being a parent? Should anyone in the public eye be denied?

What will everyone say when those kids grow up to be well-adjusted and happy despite the scrutiny? And there's one thing that people are missing. Those kids have each other. Eight children going through the same thing together, a ready-made support system. That gives me a least a little hope. Though once again, Jon and Kate aren't the only ones potentially hurting those children, are they? If you find it unpalatable for parents to submit their children to such a life, wouldn't it make infinitely more sense to not be a part of that life? Wouldn't it be smarter to not give your own very public opinion? Seems to me that the harsh words of the media stand to hurt those children much more than anything the parents are capable of doing.

Whatever the lives any of the Gosselins live, publicly or privately, they only have to answer to each other, their loved ones and, yeah, the legal team helping each person handle such affairs. None of us will ever truly understand the lives they live. None of us will ever truly understand how they feel. It's the height of ignorance to assume we know more about anything, from their lives before, to the lives they lead now, to the potential of that life in any direction in the future.

Everyone has opinions and we are certainly entitled to our feelings. Apathy is not often considered a preferable trait. Opinions are one thing. Entitlement is another thing, entirely. And one of us are entitled to know better than the Gosselins are. Especially when none of us have ever lived their lives or one even remotely the same.

6.10.09

this is me making a REAL choice

I'm disgusted. Disgusted, enraged and even more disenchanted with both the culture and religion I was born into. Specifically, the way the two have been working together among some smaller groups on this island to discriminate and judge an entire demographic of people who are asking for so little. Specifically, I am referring to Bill 138. Those of you from Guam are probably familiar with this bill. Those who aren't will understand what I'm talking about after reading this entry.

I'd also like to say that I, by no means, am finding fault with the core of what I consider "my culture". I am not finding fault in the people of Guam, an island I cherish more than I can express. I am also not normally a person who is fundamentally against any organized religion. I understand the need for faith. It's a faith I do not have though I usually respect the faith of others. By this post, I do not intend to call out every Chamoru or Guamanian or Catholic or Christian. I am making this post in reference to the people who CHOOSE to believe in things I find disgusting. I am making this post in reference to the people who CHOOSE to express their beliefs in a certain manner that rocks me to my core.

First of all, I am not an objective person. In fact, I am rather weary of people who cling to objectivity as a crutch, believing this the only reasonable way to analyze and deal with situations that involve people, people's feelings, people's emotions, people's ways of life. However, there are certain things that I try to look at as objectively as possible. I believe that no matter what your way of life, no one has to accept it. People have every right to choose to either condone or condemn another's lifestyle, whether that lifestyle is one of choice or one that is the most natural way a person is able to live.

That said, whatever one's beliefs or morals, it again comes down to choice. One's religion is quite possibly the most significant choice one can make. It often represents the body of rules outside of the government that inspires most of our decision making.

I am not a person of faith. That is my choice. That is how I've chosen to live my life. Whether one agrees or disagrees, I understand myself and have the best perspective of my life experience and am, at this point, the best judge of how to deal with the world around me. Religion, the one I lived for the first part of my life, is not the best way for me to deal.

Just as it is anyone's choice whether or not to accept the thoughts, words and actions of the gay community, it is my choice whether or not to accept those who believe that being gay is wrong. And I don't accept it. I do not accept any person who does not support the rights of man, gay or straight. I do not accept a religion that preaches that homosexuality is wrong. I choose to find such beliefs disgusting. I choose to believe that homosexuality is not a choice.

I choose to be logical. Homosexuality as a choice is not logical.

I've watched as a reverend spoke out at a public hearing, listening to this man who understands so little as he spoke out as a person whose vocation it is to instruct and educate, albeit in a religious setting. I've sat in church (only there out of respect for mourning loved ones), aghast that they would add in an extra prayer at the end of the mass, with the only intention to speak out against same-sex marriages. I've heard people blame the threat of typhoons on the proposed bill, saying that a destructive force of nature is God's way of punishing those who desire to pass a bill authorizing same-sex civil unions, by far the most inflammatory thing I've heard so far and I've heard plenty. I've read the criticism of Bill 138, people citing the discriminatory nature of it, and I wonder how one could be so illogical to not understand why Bill 138 was written so, not realizing that those stipulations were not motivated by the gay community and its supporters, but by those who are against same-sex marriages because of the erroneous claim that it will allow people who are not actually gay to apply for such unions for special benefits associated with marriage. (Because heterosexual people are above marriage for convenience? Because a man and woman would never enter into a marriage with the single purpose to receive marital benefits?)

As an adult with a sound mind, I believe that we can choose what we are and are not offended by. I don't often choose offense. I don't like to give another person's actions or words power over my emotions. But this is something I choose to find offense in. I am offended that there are people I love who are discriminated against, often by the very church they serve religiously. I am offended that people believe that any kind of natural disaster is the act of a God to punish the very people you believe he created. I am offended that good people, smart people, kind people, interesting people, ANY people are made to feel betrayed by their own loved ones and neighbors, simply because they happen to love someone who is of the same gender.

I would also like to say that I know there are people of faith who accept anyone, regardless of their sexual orientation. I know there are people who find it wrong but would not dare to tell another how to live his or her life or feel that those feelings should be related to laws outside of the church. They are not the people this blog entry is about.

And if this offends any who are close to me, by all means let me know. Come to me and tell me that my thoughts offend you. Perhaps we can discuss it when emotions are not that high. Be forewarned, I am deeply moved by this issue and my emotions are a big part of it. Perhaps we will not ever see eye-t0-eye. Perhaps your foundation is what offends me and mine is what offends you. And that, again, would be a choice.

13.9.09

i've found my religion

Secondarily nothing. I've learned that, perhaps, compartmentalizing my life is not always the most conducive way to reach the peace of mind I've been after all my life. When one thing changes or affects me, it affects all of me. At this stage, I no longer really feel the need to be "the old Erin" sometimes and be "the new Erin" at others. Whatever changes I've undergone are neither subtle or isolated. The things that have unexpectedly become a big part of my life have changed the way I look at the world. And truth be told, no matter how Harlequin romance it sounds and how I've never been this way, even as a melodramatic teenager with hormones I chose to run from instead of deal with, at the center of this change is one person. Not me. No, not me. It's him.

I won't deny that there have been times during the roller coaster ride of the most incredible relationship I've ever known, when I've found myself pulling at my harness and trying to unlatch the safety bar, wanting only to get the hell off and out of this because that's all I knew how to do. I didn't face my fears or stick to it through the difficult situations. I was much more capable at leaving it all behind and getting over situations, other people and myself. But more and more, as I quickly got closer to this man who had occupied my whole mind and heart, and we created a family that I could never run from, I had to teach myself, by myself, to stick around and put some effort into the most amazing and life changing experience I had ever known. It's been most difficult when it was evident that I chose to spend my life with a man who was had his own coping mechanism: escapism. I ran while he buried things way down so that he'd never have to deal. It's a struggle, still, and sometimes it gets harder and the fights get worse with each situation. And when the day ends and we come back to our real lives, we come back to each other.

And that's what it always comes back to. That's what everything comes back to. The most wonderful part of my life are my kids and they wouldn't be here without him. The person I've become, the way I've grown, the struggles I've had to deal with and overcome, even the person I am when he is not around, for all of that he was the catalyst. He is what started it all. He and the incredible connection that even in our darkest moments we swear is one that no one has ever had and no one ever will. What he did not show, teach or give me directly, he at least inspired and motivated. Everything I've done that's been good and everything I've created that I'm proud of, from my family to my work to my friendships and other relationships, I've done because I want my life to be better, because I want to be better for us. For him.

Belief. Hope. Faith. Inspiration. Grace. I know what it's all about now. I've found the peace that many search for, that many have found. But I've found it in someone real and tangible, in a person who exists in a material world, who fills all my senses. And all that matters to me is that I'm a better person because of it, better than I had ever been searching for faith in something I could never see and never, ever truly felt.

Love is my religion. And all I know of love I learned because of him.




And now we return to our regularly scheduled programming...

26.8.09

there is magic

There is magic.

There is magic in the drop of water quivering on a leaf as it bends back toward the earth that gave it life. When the world choked on the dry air of a still evening when no rain fell from the sky, there is magic.

There is magic when light streaks across a colorful sky. When the sun bows to its maiden, lending her its seat in the heavens, shining behind the scenes where we cannot see it; shining only to make the moon glow, there is magic.

There is magic when the distance between friends, close. In late night phone calls and stories with no ending. In inside jokes and knowing glances. In memories that would not mean as much if they were about anyone else. In friendship that picks up where it left off. In not being able to explain how two different people were able to find a common ground. In endless laughter and conversations about nothing in particular. In finding another group to which we belong. When we know that "soul mate" does not mean "lover". When we know exactly who to call and where to go when magic is hard to find. In the family that was not given but created. In the support that only friendship can offer, there is magic.

There is magic in the embrace that exists in what was once too much space. In the pride that is stripped away to reveal compassion. In open hearts and open minds. In letting go of anger to make room for love. In the freedom that only forgiveness brings, there is magic.

There is magic in the spirit of togetherness. In the symphony of many peoples' tears. When towers fall and worlds explode and those who left to bear witness find comfort in each other. When chaos is conquered and order is restored. When planes and buildings are broken but spirit is not. In the camaraderie that only brothers at arms understand. When hope is the only things that helps us survive, there is magic.

There is magic in stories of a world we have never seen. In the legacy of people we have never met. In hands that meet around a dinner table. In the home not made of bricks and mortar, but of memories shared and moments had. In the people who were there when our life started, who've watched us grow and wondered what we would become. In the moment a child is brought home and a promise is made till death do us part. In knowing the permanence of family is still flexible enough to welcome others. In knowing we can always go back home, there is magic.

There is magic in finding strength in the intangible. In the "knowing" only faith can bring. In a constant presence we cannot name. In the only comfort left when the world is full of pain. In silent prayers and the jubilation of songs of worship. In the celebration of a life that science cannot explain. In one final, desperate cry for salvation. In living with a goal of one day meeting paradise. In knowing that no person is truly ever alone, there is magic.

There is magic in a bashful smile. In the breath caught in lovers' chests. In the skip of two hearts that have learned to beat together. In the infinity that exists in the palm of a hand. In the space between two pairs of lips before they meet, only a second after their souls embraced. In a slow dance of hearts. In finding "home" in another person's arms, there is magic.

There is magic in the first sign of life in a mother's belly. In the perfection that can only exist after pain. In the first sound a baby makes when he has found his mother's heartbeat and his father's voice. In finding unconditional love in a child's smile. In the first "I love you" uttered from a mouth that has not said many words, yet. When a person stops being a person and becomes a parent, there is magic.

There is magic in the smile of a child welcomed into a stranger's home. In knowing that it's love, not DNA, that makes a family. In finding that love in a face that looks nothing like ours. In rescuing a child from an unknown fate. When love is given without prejudice. When skin color and language no longer matter. When "orphan" is dropped and "son" or "daughter" are the only words that matter, there is magic.

There is magic without potions or incantations. Without prayers or mantras. Without wands or crystal balls. Without smoke and mirrors or pay per view and Vegas shows. There is magic without cards or coins, top hats with bunnies or boxes with trick bottoms.

There is magic even where we cannot see it.

There is magic that fiction has yet to define.

In the world, there is magic. In life and love. In us. In beauty.

In everything, there is magic.

7.8.09

a survey in memory of

A survey in memory of John Hughes (2/18/50-8/6/09)

Answer the following questions about John Hughes movies and tag 15 friends to take this survey.

1. Best John Hughes movie (as director or writer)?
-- Ferris Bueller's Day Off

2. Best National Lampoon movie?
-- the best lampoon movies had nothing to do with Hughes

3. Favorite Brat Packer (in Hughes movies)?
-- Andrew McCarthy

4. Hottest male Brat Packer (in Hughes movies)?
-- Andrew McCarthy

5. Hottest female Brat Packer (in Hughes movies)?
-- Uhhh...Ally Sheedy?

6. Gary or Wyatt (Weird Science)?
-- Gary

7. Claire or Allison (The Breakfast Club)?
-- Allison, of course

8. Jake from Sixteen Candles or Blaine from Pretty in Pink?
-- *swoooooon* Jake Ryan was perfection.

9. Bigger A$$hole: Steff from Pretty in Pink or Hardy from Some Kind of Wonderful?
-- Hardy was kind of hot. Steff was way worse.

10. Are you the brain, the athlete, the basket case, the princess or the criminal?
-- Uhhh...the criminal? (Didn't you watch the movie, we are ALL of them...pssshh)

11. Best John Candy movie: Uncle Buck, The Great Outdoors or Planes, Trains and Automobiles?
-- This is too hard. Great Outdoors wins by a hair.

12. Home Alone 1 or 2?
-- 1 because it made me cry. 2 because it was in NY.

13. Cuter kid: Doyle from Dutch or Curly Sue?
-- Gross. Curly Sue, of course.

14. Best sidekick: Cameron from Ferris Bueller's Day Off or Watts from Some Kind of Wonderful?
-- When Cameron was in Egypt laaaand...let my Cameron goooooo.

15. Biggest Anthony Michael Hall geek: Farmer Ted, Brian Johnson or Gary Wallace?
-- Most of the time, Farmer Ted. But Brian Johnson is cooler when he's stoned.

16. Best unrequited crush: Ducky or Farmer Ted?
-- Farmer Ted

17. Most over-rated actor (in Hughes movies)?
-- Hmmm... I don't like Chevy Chase, actually.

18. Most under-rated actor (in Hughes movies)?
-- Josie and Jim in Career Opportunities

19. Best Ringwald: Sam or Andie?
-- Sam was more endearing

20. Worst sibling: Ginny from Sixteen Candles or Chet from Weird Science?
-- Chet!

21. Non-Hughes fringe Brat Pracker cameo: John Cusack (Farmer Ted's friend in Sixteen Candles) or Robert Downey Jr. (A bully in Weird Science)?
-- Ooooh. Too tough. Both are my two longest running crushes since ever since...and they just keep getting better *le sigh*.

22. Best girl who wins: Watts in Some Kind of Wonderful or Sam in Sixteen Candles?
-- WATTS!!!

23. Best girl who loses: Amanda in Some Kind of Wonderful or Caroline in Sixteen Candles?
-- Amanda was prettier.

24. Worst John Hughes movie (as writer or director)?
-- Home Alone 3

25. Best Long Duck Dong quote: "Whassahappanin hot stuff?" or "No more yanky my wanky. The Donger need FOOD!"
-- I liked the pure and simple, "No way Jose." when he thought Jake was coming to kick his ass.

5.8.09

"geek, ahoy!" - an incredibly nerdy survey

There were a few universities I had my sights set on upon graduation from high school. All were chosen for different reasons, some of them highly contradictory (Emerson College because it was so far away, University of Hawaii because it was close to home, etc.) I chose various intended majors on my applications, all of them having something to do with Literature or Communication. I ended up going to school on Guam and chose the only thing I really could: English Literature. I had only one reason: Because I liked it. Actually, because I liked it, I knew I'd excel in it and I wouldn't have to work too hard.

That turned out to be a crock considering I quickly realized that English majors read more than twice the amount of most other majors and write significantly more papers. There is no practicum in this field. It's just reading and reading and writing and writing and it never ends. Despite the fact that I've read most of the things I have to read in my college courses and all the material is rather familiar to me, I still have to re-read everything so that the details stick and become second nature while I pull an all-nighter, cranking out some insane twelve-page paper.

Then there's the reality we all were aware of back then but didn't understand till it was too late. In majoring in something we "loooooove" and not selling out, we sold ourselves short. I cannot do anything with this damn major. I can get to certain places that require a lot more work and extra school, no doubt, but nothing I can look forward to immediately. All of this could have been done in my free time while I opened myself up to a different field, figuring out what works and hoping that the thing that works will give me guaranteed cash relatively soon after I got that damn degree.

Whatever. I didn't happen that way. I didn't sell out. Yay, frickin', me! And I'm only planning to one day go back to school to finish up because I've already invested so much time and energy and money (that I'm still paying back). I've come too far to abandon it.

So really, what my major has done is provide me with a brain interested in something as dorky as the following. I will not tag anyone. I will not expect anyone to respond. I'm just using the gears in my head for something. Anything.

Directions:

Below are some of the most significant periods in literature. Name your favorite sub-genre (if applicable), author and work from each period. Also name the one work or author you like least.

1. Greek Tragedians

- writer: Sophocles
- work: Orestes by Euripides

2. Roman

(I don't know if this is asking for Roman tragedy or Roman literature in general, so...)

- genre: Classical Poetry
- writer: Seneca
- work: Metamorphoses by Ovid

3. Old English

(This was around the same time so I'm skipping over any Beowulf mention and heading over to Japan)
- work: Tale of Genji by Murasaki Shikibu

4. Medieval

- genre: Humanism
- writer: Dante
- work: Le Morte d'Arthur by Sir Thomas Mallory
- least favorite: Geoffrey Chaucer

5. Renaissance

- genre: Elizabethan
- writer: John Milton
- work: Don Quixote by Cervantes
- least favorite: William Shakespeare (No, really? Yes! Really.)

6. Neoclassical

- genre: Restoration
- writer: Moliere
- work: Candide by Voltaire

7. The Victorians

- writer: Charles Dickens
- work: The Importance of Being Earnest by Oscar Wilde

8. Romanticism

- genre: Dark Romanticism
- author: Edgar Allan Poe
- work: Les Miserables by Victor Hugo
- least favorite: Jane Austen and the Brontes

9. Transcendentalism

- Though not techincally a "transcendentalist", the only author connected to this that I appreciate is Emily Dickinson

10. Realism

- genre: Russian Realism
- author: Leo Tolstoy
- work: Madame Bovary by Gustave Flaubert

11. Edwardian

- author: H.G. Wells
- work: Pygmalion by George Bernard Shaw

12. Naturalism

- author: John Steinbeck
- work: An American Tragedy by Theodore Dreiser

13. Existentialism

- genre: Absurdism
- author: Franz Kafka, Albert Camus, Edward Albee, Samuel Beckett, Lewis Carroll
- work: Notes from the Underground by Fyodor Dostoevsky

14. Modernism

- Lost Generation
- author: Ernest Hemingway, T.S. Eliot, George Orwell, William Faulkner, Tennessee Williams, Kurt Vonnegut, F. Scott Fitzgerald
- work: The Sound and the Fury by William Faulkner, The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock by T.S. Eliot
- least favorite: James Joyce, William Carlos Williams

15. Post Modernism

- genre: Beat Writers
- author: Allen Ginsberg, Jack Kerouac, Sylvia Plath, Ken Kesey, Joseph Heller, Ray Bradbury
- work: Howl by Allen Ginsberg, One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest by Ken Kesey

When we get into the last couple movements, the lines get blurred a bit so I just entered certain works and authors where I saw fit. And there was no way I would have been able to just choose one for existentialism, modernism and post-modernism.

2.8.09

teach a man to fish

I am multi-racial. I am of mixed ancestry. Among many other ethnicities, I am Chamoru, Irish, German and Hawaiian. My father had fair skin and gray eyes. My mother has dark skin and dark features. I came out as almost a perfect combination of both of my parents. If you look at other people in my family, whose physical characteristics are different from my parents', you'd see I also have inherited traits that were not passed down to my parents but through. My father's angular face is not that of mine. Instead, my face is a collection of curves and flesh, with no angles, no prominent bone structure, whether that comes from either of my round featured grandmothers. I did not get either of my parents' straight, boyish figures of their youth. As puberty hit, my back broadened, my hips expanded, my breasts grew and I was given a frame that was made up of as many curves as my face was. I don't know where I get my freakishly small feet from. I have square hands that cannot be considered graceful. I have length in my legs where my father's length came from his torso.

And then there's my skin. Though many would argue that the darker skin color always wins out, that's clearly not the case for me. It's not the case for three of my closest friends in high school, all of whom had one parent who looked mostly white and one parent who was brown. All four of us are light-skinned, even though two of us had "white parents" who were also multi-racial, whose parents were also part brown.

My light complexion was a concern of my parents when I was a child. They feared that the island had not changed enough since they were in school and that I would be discriminated against by my darker, more indigenous looking classmates because of my white skin. I can honestly say I never felt that discrimination. I've never felt like "the haole". I was once surprised when a classmate asked me if I was full Chamoru; me with my white skin and my very white last name. But I knew that mindset still existed. I had heard stories by people who were around my age. I've witnessed it from afar. I've heard people screaming about, "Fucking haoles". I've seen it and never lived it. In fact, I've felt a lot more like the brown person standing out in a room of white people than I have as a white person standing out in a room of brown people.

Because of my generally good experiences with race on this island, despite my observations of racism perpetuated by other people and the treatment of other people at the hands of such prejudice, I still tend to believe in the good of others. I like to think that, for the most part, my fellow Guamanians are above such ignorant beliefs. With several occupations that have changed the face of our island and our culture, I am aware of the cultural phenomena that were brought to this island. Those of us who can consider ourselves indigenous also live lives that were shaped by other races, whether it's about people like me, who are multi-racial, or those who aren't. Religion, diet, environment, language. Everything has changed. Some choose to cling to what they believe is a better life, a better culture without certain changes, even as they blindly follow or practice things that were the inspiration of other races and people from other parts of the world. Some of us choose to accept change and the natural evolution of culture. Most of us pick and choose what we would like to change and what we would like to keep.

Throughout the history of my island, my home, the only physical place in this vast world I feel I am connected to, many issues have surfaced questioning the rights of this island's residents. As we struggle for self-determination, weighing the benefits of continued US occupation or the slim chance at independence or any situation that straddles the thin line between the two, we are constantly considering smaller but still important issues that deal with determination and the rights of all people who call this island home, whether they can be considered indigenous or not. From the land of original owners being taken away by the federal government, to the language that is not used as much as it was when my parents were children, we are faced with questions and situations that can anger and insult even the most cool-headed residents. Despite the thousands of years that people have lived on this island, we are still miles and miles away from any kind of consensus that all of us can live with.

One of the most recent issues facing the island is the bill proposed by Senator Judy Guthertz and other authors. Bill-190 hopes to amend another act that had granted special fishing rights to indigenous peoples on the island. This new bill aims to change the language from "indigenous" to "aboriginal" as the previous act did not consider racial and/or ethnic bloodlines. According to this amendment, under the previous act, an indigenous person is one who was made an American citizen as of the 1950 Organic Act and their descendants. With the language changing to "aboriginal", this would only grant special fishing privileges to those who have been proven to have Chamoru blood, passed down throughout many generations originating from those who existed before any other country's occupation on Guam.

There are many things that concern me about Bill-190. The first being that these rights would grant people special privilege within much of Guam's waters, some of them being marine preserves. I am not comfortable with anyone harvesting the marine life from these preserves. Those preserves are there for a reason. While I witness local people and their rage over not being able to feed their families by fishing in these preserves, using a past-time that is one of the most significant of our people, I wonder what kind of lives they want their children to live. If they continue to deplete our marine life for the sake of livelihood, what of that livelihood do they plan to pass on to their descendants? They will be sharing the love of fishing with their children so that those children grow to find that they can no longer practice that love as the waters no longer house the wildlife their ancestors once fished for.

Another concern is a more personal one. Why should aboriginal people have the only special access to our waters? Under Bill-190, not only will aboriginal people be granted permission to use these waters, but it will also put together a board of people to determine how to restrict other waters to people who are deemed not aboriginal. This means that our local fishermen, no matter how long they've lived on this island and how much a part of our history they are, will suffer a great loss as their livelihood and businesses are restricted so much that the one thing they enjoy the most, the one thing they've fed and housed and clothed their children with, is going to be taken away from them.

As with most places, this island is the home of many people who cannot claim an aboriginal link with. We locals, aboriginal or not, love nothing more than someone coming to the island and falling in love with this place. We are a people known for our warmth and welcoming nature. It's something that has been passed down through many, many years throughout some of those mentioned occupations, even when those occupations ended in a loss of culture and identity. I have friends and family who call this place home, friends and family who are of many different races and ethnicities, friends and family who cannot claim to be Chamoru. Some of those people speak the language more or better than some of us who are Chamoru. Some of those people care more about the island than those who were here before them. Some of those people are the first to speak up about the beauty that is found on Guam while some of those who have been here longer relocate to other parts of the world and have forgotten what they've learned and gained by having been born of this land.

One of those people is the father of a classmate of mine. Being a private school brat not restricted to going to schools based on village residence, I tend to see different faces as I transfer or graduate from one school to another. Only a couple of the girls I graduated from high school with were my classmates from the very first day we walked into our school clad in pink and white checkered jumpers and black and white oxford shoes. One of those girls has light skin, light hair, light eyes just like her father. They are not Chamoru. But they were raised on this island. Her father, in fact, spent more time calling this island home than my own mother did being raised by my grandfather who was in the Air Force, moving his children around the globe from one station to another. If asked to recall people from my childhood, memories of those who were always around no matter where I went, Mr. Atherton, my classmate's father, would easily be one of those people. It's been 24 years since I first saw him. A year in all the time has not gone by without my seeing him around the island. His is one face I will never forget or mistake for someone else. While I see other classmates' parents and cannot place them, Mr. Atherton is one of a few who is stuck in my memory forever, from visions of his ever-present smile and seeing him in his pickup truck on the roads, probably on his way to go fishing. And this is not a friend who I have been close to all my life. I've never been to her house. I've probably never even spoken to her father. There is no other reason for my remembering him other than the fact that he's lived here as long as my memory takes me back. In reality, he's lived here much longer than that, still.

Mr. Atherton is a fisherman. His livelihood fed and housed his children, through our expensive private school upbringing to college. He's raised beautiful daughters proud of the island they come from. Guam is their home. Guam is the island that shaped a big part of who they are as it did with their father.

Under Bill-190, this man will be restricted from the very thing that fostered his attachment with the island all because of the color of his skin; all because of the origin of his first language; all because he wasn't born of the island but still chose to call it home. He, and others like him, will no longer have access to their own home.

One of those others is Dan Narcis, a man I had the privilege of observing while I was a mentor with 4H during a fisheries clinic. He was teaching my kids how to use a talaya, a net used for fishing. Narcis, an incredible fisherman, has been recognized by the island as a Master weaver. He speaks the language. He even looks like what would be considered an aboriginal person of Guam. Narcis, however, is Hawaiian. This man, noted by any person within the fishing community as one of the best fishermen on Guam, would have restricted access to the very thing that nurtured his craft and had him regarded as a Master.

Both of these men, known by many long before this bill was drafted, have been outspoken about their opposition to a bill that insults the very foundation of who they are and betrays their love of and loyalty to Guam, an island that is much their home as it is any of ours.

I care deeply of the rights of indigenous people. I consider myself one of them. I am not in favor of anything that will push our people further back in the hopes of a strong economic or military presence by those who care nothing about the island or her people. I am also not in favor of anything that will rob those who call this island home, who love Guam and her people, who've been here forever, just because they don't have the right DNA.

Racism should not be met with racism. Discrimination takes many forms and affects all people. One does not have to be a certain color in order to be attached to any given area. Those who love Guam, who nurture and protect her, who would be the first to lay down to defend her, are the people who need most protection by the laws that govern this land. It doesn't matter who they are or where their parents come from. Isn't this the very thing that drives us back home when we feel very little consideration in the land of other people who treat us as outsiders?

We are supposed to be above this. We are supposed to be more sensitive about these issues. We are not a people that shuts others out. We are a culture of warmth and appreciation and steadfast cooperation. Those are the things we need most to cultivate and nurture. Those are the things that make us all most proud to call this island "home", no matter what our skin color or language is.

22.7.09

loves, new and old - part 1


The Free Design

The Free Design is a vocal group that had a cult following in the 70's. Sometimes dubbed "baroque pop" for their classical influences, the group consisted of the Dedrick family. Their albums had a few covers with Chris Dedrick writing most of the original songs. Poppy, catchy and sometimes over the top with its cutesiness, the sunshine and rainbow songs still made evident the Dedrick family's musical talent with jazz inspired chord progressions and its mainstay in the underground, inspiring some noted musicians and groups such as Beck, Stereolab and Pizzicato Five. Despite a lack of commercial success and the group's break up less than a decade after they emerged, as many small groups have, they gained notoriety with their songs appearing in commercials and soundtracks.

My dormant love affair with this group was revived when watching Yo Gabba Gabba with the kids and saw a cartoon bit set to "I Found Love". I don't have a favorite song. But when the mood hits or I need a little sunshine in my life - because I can't stand the actual sun - I hit up the few tracks I have on my ipod and it puts a smile on my face.

I know if my dad had heard this band, he would have loved them.

Il Postino

An Italian language film by Michael Radford, Il Postino tells the story of the exiled Chilean poet, Pablo Neruda, and the unexpected friendship he develops with his postman while in Italy, a deviation from the novel and original 1983 movie, which took place in Chile. While Pablo Neruda is, indeed, a real person (and one of my favorite poets), the story is fictional.

Exiled to Italy for his Communist views, Neruda makes a home in a small Italian fishing village and meets Mario, who turns out to be his own personal postman. In learning who Neruda is, Mario becomes interested in poetry and the two men become close friends and the poet assists Mario in courting Beatrice by using poetry and metaphor. The rest of the film explores this friendship, the simplicity of love and companionship set against the simple life.

My father said it best. This movie is simply sweet. I cannot get enough of it. Despite its bittersweet ending, I've watched this movie rather often, thinking about the simple love that existed between the main characters, whether that love be friendship or romance. Simplicity. Purity. The foundation of love and life in a world that is getting increasingly complicated and fast paced.

Both Sides Now by Joni Mitchell
Though this is both a song and the album, I am talking about the song, here.
A contrast to the band and the movie mentioned above, this song is a sad one or rather, a melancholy song about growth and change and how we once saw things a certain way in our youth and how they change as we grow.
My favorite line...
"Well, something's lost and something's gained in living every day."
It's a spark of hope in having learned and grown. Losing the innocence of youth isn't always that bad.